\documentclass{beamer}
\usetheme{Madrid}


\usepackage{appendixnumberbeamer}


\title{Project Title}
\subtitle{Final Presentation}
\author{Students Names and ID number}
\date{May 28, 2025}

\begin{document}

\frame{\titlepage}

\begin{frame}{Motivation}
\begin{itemize}
    \item What is the problem and why it is important?
    \item Why game theoretic analysis can help understand/solve the problem?
    \item Find 1 visual or analogy that could explain the core idea to a non-specialist
    \item Common mistakes: the problem not well-motivated and getting too specific without giving an overall understanding to those who have never seen the problem.
    \item Remedy: imagine explaining your problem to a friend without a technical background
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Problem Statement}
\begin{itemize}
    \item Put mathematics into problem
    \item Ensure to introduce every symbol you use
    \item Minimize the number of symbols and equations
    \item Use concepts of the course in the mathematical formulation
    \item Common mistakes: too many math symbols, and some not defined
    \item Remedy: have some math to clarify but minimize it. Don't introduce acronyms unless absolutely necessary
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Past Work}
\begin{itemize}
    \item Brief review of 3-4 approaches to address this problem
    \item Maximum 6 bullet points and 30 words on the slide
    \item Each slide should take 1 minute approximately to present
    \item Common mistakes: the open question in past work is not clear. What hasn't past work been able to do? And why (you can only speculate)?
    \item Remedy: get specific, and try to think of arranging the past work to bring all attention to the point you want to address in your project
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Your Approach 1}
\begin{itemize}
    \item What mathematical model did you choose for the problem?
    \item Which tools from the course you used to analyze the game and exactly how?
    \item End each slide with a question or statement that sets up the next, for example, ``This model gives us equilibria but what happens when we introduce incomplete information?"
    \item Common mistakes:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Assuming audience understands your problem well and not giving clear explanation of why you chose certain approach
        \item Not using the mathematics developed in the course
    \end{itemize}
    \item Remedy: focus on approaches covered in the course and keep providing connection of these approaches to your problem
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Your Approach 2}
\begin{itemize}
    \item Continuation of the previous slide --- expand depending on your project (theory, simulation, literature review)
    \item For analysis, show high level idea of how you went about it. Your fellow students should be able to follow. 
    \item Common mistakes: assuming audience has memorized all the symbols in your previous slides
    \item Remedy: minimize symbols in slides. If something needs to be re-iterated, then bring the symbol again
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Your Approach 3}
\begin{itemize}
    \item Same comments as previous slide
    \item For simulations, ensure to have high quality figures with properly labeled axis and captions
    \item Additional comments:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Ensure to have slide numbers
        \item Think of the ending of each slide as a transition to the new slide
        \item Anticipate audience questions --- imagine 10 questions per slide
        \item Approx. 1 minute per slide helps avoid making too many
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Maximum 3 Take-Away Messages}
\begin{itemize}
    \item What problem you addressed
    \item What did your analysis/approach reveal
    \item What did you learn from this experience
    \item If you had more time, what would you do
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\appendix

\begin{frame}{Backup slide}
You can be prepared for the Q\&A by providing 
\begin{itemize}
\item A more detailed version of a math derivation

\item An extra graph or dataset

\item A related case study they couldn?t fit
\end{itemize}

\end{frame}

\end{document}