Student seminar: security protocols and applications

With this form, you will be able to mark your peers. The guidelines for doing so are presented hereby below.

Grade Scale:  1 (worst) to 6 (best), given overall for the presentation and the report.

Grade semantics:
6.0 perfect
5.5 very good
5.0 good
4.5 acceptable, but something appears to be missing
4.0 minimally acceptable
3.5 insufficient
3.0 seems there are some mistakes
2.5 severe mistakes
2.0 did not understand anything
1.5 outrageously bad
1.0 did not work at all
0.0 did not show up

Criteria:
Clear explanation: Was the explanation clear and interesting enough? Do you understand what they are saying?
Understanding: How much do you think the presenter has understood this topic?
Contribution: How much effort do you think the presenter  put into this?
Overall: The grade that you give to your peer, i.e., the average of  “clear explanation”, “understanding” and “contribution”. This grade of yours will then be used, in a weighted average, when giving the final mark for the course to your peer.