@article{holligerMethaneProductionFullScale2017,
  title = {Methane {{Production}} of {{Full-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plants Calculated}} from {{Substrate}}'s {{Biomethane Potentials Compares Well}} with the {{One Measured On-Site}}},
  author = {Holliger, Christof and {Fruteau de Laclos}, H{\'e}l{\`e}ne and Hack, Gabrielle},
  year = {2017},
  month = jun,
  journal = {Frontiers in Energy Research},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {12},
  issn = {2296-598X},
  doi = {10.3389/fenrg.2017.00012},
  abstract = {Biomethane potential (BMP) tests are used to determine the amount of methane that can be produced from organic materials in order to design different components of fullscale anaerobic digestion (AD) plants such as size of the digesters and units exploiting the produced biogas. However, little is known on how well BMPs compare with biogas production from the same organic materials in full-scale installations. In this study, two AD plants were chosen to carry out such comparisons, a dry AD plant treating green waste from urban areas and food waste from restaurants and supermarkets, and a liquid AD plant treating waste sludge from wastewater treatment and seven additional organic wastes. The BMPs of multiple samples of the individual organic materials collected during a period of 7\textendash 9 months were determined. Separate tests of mixtures of organic materials confirmed that the BMP of the mixtures can be calculated by adding the BMPs of the individual materials. The weekly methane production during the investigated periods was calculated from the full-scale installation data on the feeding of the digesters and the BMPs of each substrate fed into the digesters and compared with the weekly methane production measured on-site. The latter was calculated from the most accurately measured entity, either the electricity or the volume of purified biomethane injected into the grid. The weekly methane production rates calculated from BMPs and the one measured on-site were very similar and followed the same pattern. Some exceptions could be explained by, e.g., an overload of the full-scale installation. The measured weekly methane production accounted for 94.0 {$\pm$} 6.8 and 89.3 {$\pm$} 5.7\% of the calculated weekly methane production for the wet and dry AD plant, respectively. For 26 out of 29 weeks, the calculated weekly methane production overestimated the measured one in the case of the wet AD plant and for 37 out of 39 weeks for the dry AD plant. Based on these results, it is proposed using an extrapolation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.9 to estimate the methane production of full-scale AD plants from BMPs of the substrates to be digested and their specific organic loads.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/dareen/Zotero/storage/C4GINGMH/Holliger et al. - 2017 - Methane Production of Full-Scale Anaerobic Digesti.pdf}
}

@manual{R-bookdown,
  type = {Manual},
  title = {Bookdown: {{Authoring}} Books and Technical Documents with {{R}} Markdown},
  author = {Xie, Yihui},
  year = {2022},
  note = {https://github.com/rstudio/bookdown}
}

@article{shiDairyProcessingSludge2021,
  title = {Dairy Processing Sludge and Co-Products: {{A}} Review of Present and Future Re-Use Pathways in Agriculture},
  shorttitle = {Dairy Processing Sludge and Co-Products},
  author = {Shi, W. and Healy, M.G. and Ashekuzzaman, S.M. and Daly, K. and Leahy, J.J. and Fenton, O.},
  year = {2021},
  month = sep,
  journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production},
  volume = {314},
  pages = {128035},
  issn = {09596526},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128035},
  abstract = {The dairy industry is one of the largest global producers of wastewater and generates huge volumes of dairy processing sludge (DPS). There are two main types of DPS, lime-treated dissolved air floatation sludge and biochemically-treated activated sludge. These sludge types may also be converted to STRUBIAS (STRUvite, BIochar, AShes) products which have potential as fertilizers, secondary feedstocks for phosphate fertiliser granules, and soil amendments. A small number of studies indicate that these products have variable nutrient and metal contents, which differ across sludge and STRUBIAS product types. This is due to many factors such as the type of dairy plants, wastewater treatment process and production technologies. Although such products are land applied, the phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer equivalency value (FEV) are often unknown and not factored into application rates, and therefore need study under field conditions (across soil and crop types). This review identifies a need to quantify antimicrobial drugs, hormones, pesticides, disinfectants, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), microplastics and nano-particles in all DPS and STRUBIAS types. Where detected, testing should follow the transfer of these contaminants to the soil, crop and water continuum. Further knowledge in the areas identified would enable both agronomic and environmental goals to be met and promote higher uptake of DPS and STRUBIAS re-use in agriculture.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/dareen/Zotero/storage/BKUESB2M/Shi et al. - 2021 - Dairy processing sludge and co-products A review .pdf}
}

@book{xie2015,
  title = {Dynamic Documents with {{R}} and Knitr},
  author = {Xie, Yihui},
  year = {2015},
  edition = {Second},
  publisher = {{Chapman and Hall/CRC}},
  address = {{Boca Raton, Florida}},
  note = {ISBN 978-1498716963}
}
